Module Name:    src
Committed By:   bouyer
Date:           Sat Aug 27 13:34:42 UTC 2016

Modified Files:
        src/doc [netbsd-6]: CHANGES-6.2

Log Message:
tickets 1367, 1369, 1372


To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.1.2.257 -r1.1.2.258 src/doc/CHANGES-6.2

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.

Modified files:

Index: src/doc/CHANGES-6.2
diff -u src/doc/CHANGES-6.2:1.1.2.257 src/doc/CHANGES-6.2:1.1.2.258
--- src/doc/CHANGES-6.2:1.1.2.257	Thu Jul 21 12:58:24 2016
+++ src/doc/CHANGES-6.2	Sat Aug 27 13:34:42 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# $NetBSD: CHANGES-6.2,v 1.1.2.257 2016/07/21 12:58:24 martin Exp $
+# $NetBSD: CHANGES-6.2,v 1.1.2.258 2016/08/27 13:34:42 bouyer Exp $
 
 A complete list of changes from the 6.1 release until the 6.2 release:
 
@@ -14603,3 +14603,33 @@ libexec/mail.local/mail.local.c			1.28
 	Fix error checks in open(2) calls.
 	[shm, ticket #1392]
 
+sys/miscfs/kernfs/kernfs_vnops.c		1.151
+	>From Ilya Zykov: Unbreak kernfs which was broken by this commit
+
+	|Make the spec_node table implementation private to spec_vnops.c.
+	|To retrieve a spec_node, two new lookup functions (by device or
+	| by mount) are implemented.  Both return a referenced vnode,
+	| for an opened block device the opened vnode is returned so
+	| further diagnostic checks "vp == ... sd_bdevvp" will not fire.
+	| Otherwise any vnode matching the criteria gets returned.
+	|No objections on tech-kern.
+
+	The effect was that ls /kernfs appeared empty in most cases.    
+	[is, ticket #1367]
+
+etc/Makefile					1.403
+
+	spwd.db should be 0600 (Brooks Davis)
+	[christos, ticket #1369]
+
+bin/cp/cp.c					1.59
+
+	The '-i' flag should work regardless of whether the standard input is
+	a terminal.  The Open Group notes this historic behavior and correctly
+	notes that it doesn't make much sense.  Note also, that mv(1) has
+	always respected its '-i' regardless of whether the standard input is
+	a terminal.
+
+	From Timo Buhrmester.
+	[uwe, ticket #1372]
+

Reply via email to