On Tuesday, April 28, Tobias Weingartner wrote: > On Monday, April 27, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Revert mtx_enter_try. It didn't compile on hppa, it doesn't compile on > > landisk, and the sparc implementation is obviously wrong. That's where I > > stopped looking, so who knows what else was broken. A simple comparison of > > the existing mtx_enter with the new mtx_enter_try would have told anybody. > > Mark, can you please tell me how the sparc implementation is obviously wrong?
And with that note, I'm quite obviously incapable of reading code. Appologies Mark. It is very obviously wrong. --Toby.