Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2026/06/23 02:36, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > I disagree. > > > > This diff is many, many weeks old, and has effectively been ignored. > > There are multiple ports builders who did not incorporate it into their > > base system to explore what it does in ports. I don't see a reason to > > believe > > this diff is going to cause a problem. > > We are only just (end of last week) clear of most of the noise and > failures from the llvm update, until that happened each build meant > softing through failures to figure out the cause. Before then it > would not have been a good time for a test build.
I think this is excessive drama. I have serious doubts this fix has a new bug.
