> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:23:00AM -0600, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > CVSROOT: /cvs > > Module name: src > > Changes by: [email protected] 2010/10/28 10:23:00 > > > > Removed files: > > lib/libdes : COPYRIGHT MODES.DES Makefile README VERSION > > cbc3_enc.c cbc_cksm.c cbc_enc.c cfb64ede.c > > cfb64enc.c cfb_enc.c des.c des.doc des_crypt.3 > > des_enc.c des_locl.h des_locl.org des_opts.c > > ecb3_enc.c ecb_enc.c ede_enc.c enc_read.c > > enc_writ.c fcrypt.c ncbc_enc.c ofb64ede.c > > ofb64enc.c ofb_enc.c options.txt pcbc_enc.c > > podd.h qud_cksm.c rand_key.c read_pwd.c > > rnd_keys.c rpc_enc.c set_key.c shlib_version > > sk.h spr.h str2key.c supp.c xcbc_enc.c > > lib/libdes/asm : des-som2.pl des-som3.pl des586.pl des686.pl > > desboth.pl dx86-cpp.s dx86unix.cpp readme > > win32.asm win32.uu x86ms.pl x86unix.pl > > > > Log message: > > remove libdes src/ports users have been switched to libcrypto > > what is our definitive place for documenting the des stuff now? > "man -k des" is pretty hideous. note this entry: > > DES_random_key, DES_set_key, DES_key_sched, DES_set_key_checked, > DES_set_key_unchecked, DES_set_odd_parity, DES_is_weak_key, DES_ecb_encrypt, > DES_ecb2_encrypt, DES_ecb3_encrypt, DES_ncbc_encrypt, DES_cfb_encrypt, > DES_ofb_encrypt, DES_pcbc_encrypt, DES_cfb64_encrypt, DES_ofb64_encrypt, > DES_xcbc_encrypt, DES_ede2_cbc_encrypt, DES_ede2_cfb64_encrypt, > DES_ede2_ofb64_encrypt, DES_ede3_cbc_encrypt, DES_ede3_cbcm_encrypt, > DES_ede3_cfb64_encrypt, DES_ede3_ofb64_encrypt, DES_cbc_cksum, > DES_quad_cksum, DES_string_to_key, DES_string_to_2keys, DES_fcrypt, > DES_crypt, DES_enc_read, DES_enc_write (3) - DES encryption > > i can;t even work out what man page this is coming from!
Those manuals came from that directory, and they are now gone. > so, what place is "correct"? des_crypt.3 looks like the best candidate, > but note that FILES is now totally irrelevant. the other candidate > appears to be crypt(3)... Er.. ok, I see your confusion. The functions we now call are from openssl -lcrypt. The problem is that the openssl's documentation effort is a total joke. Just like their code...
