On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Thordur Bjornsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:15:04PM +0000, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:53:18 -0600 (MDT) > > Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > > > smtpd now uses a ram-queue instead of doing > > > a continuous walk on the disk-queue > > > > Does that not increase the chances of losing mail if a crash or panic > > occurs? Of course you may deem the performance improvement to be worth > > it? > Something has gone horribly wrong when "losing data" is "worth it" for > "performance". > i thought smtpd would be the first web scale mta.
