On 26 October 2012 23:43, Alexander Hall <alexan...@beard.se> wrote: > Miod Vallat <m...@online.fr> wrote: > >>> add a new uptime.human entry in stats, derived from uptime, but >>displayed >>> in a human readable fashion: >>> >>> uptime=123456 >>> uptime.human=1d10h17m36s >> >>Blech. Since when `1d10h17m36s' is considered human readable? > > It's been so for 1d10h17m37s. >
Why don't you just mimic uptime(1) output ? That is what people are used to.
