On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:20:12PM -0600, Philip Guenther wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs
> Module name: src
> Changes by: [email protected] 2017/09/05 22:20:12
>
> Modified files:
> regress/sys/kern/ptrace: ptrace.c
>
> Log message:
> Fix declarations
> ptrace(PT_IO) memory protection faults return EACCES, not EFAULT
Now the test fails on i386.
/usr/src/regress/sys/kern/ptrace/ptrace -Irib
ptrace: ptrace(PT_IO): Bad address
*** Error 1 in . (Makefile:19 'io_read_i_bad')
FAILED
Apparently i386 and amd64 return different errors. Do you know
why? Is it worth to invesitgate or shoud we just accept both cases?
bluhm
Index: ptrace.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/regress/sys/kern/ptrace/ptrace.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 ptrace.c
--- ptrace.c 6 Sep 2017 04:20:12 -0000 1.4
+++ ptrace.c 8 Sep 2017 11:26:01 -0000
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
if (ptrace(PT_IO, pid, (caddr_t)&piod, 0) == -1) {
warn("ptrace(PT_IO)");
- if (errno == EACCES)
+ if (errno == EACCES || errno == EFAULT)
ret = 1;
else
ret = -1;
