Doug Leavitt wrote: > Ok. I think we're almost there (Re: svn putback to jucr). > > I corrected/working dates.spec and re-submitted it via svn. > [Thanks Christian & Laca for pointing out the errors] > It builds and it appears in the build grid as successful Job 114. > > But, it does not seem to appear in review page after the > successful build. I think there may be some jucr DB linkage > missing here. Please check/advise. Presumably built jobs > from svn need to be reviewed as well.
Correct. That's what I'm working on today. _Christian > > Thanks, > Doug. > > > > Christian Kelly wrote: >> Doug Leavitt wrote: >>> Ok. I see the build now. But that begs the question >>> why it failed. the Log file claims that it's LICENSE >>> file was missing, but that was checked in at the same time. >>> >>> And it seems to be in copyright dir as expected. >>> >>> It'a s bit hard to be able to review the spec files >>> from a svn putback. >> >> Right, so an svn putback is not for that scenario. There are three >> scenarios as I see it: >> >> * Upload a spec file. >> * svn co a branch, make your changes/additions, do an svn diff and >> submit the diff. >> * svn co a branch, make your changes/additions, svn ci directly - >> assuming you have permission/know what you're doing. >> >> Yes, this isn't spelled out in the docs, I'll put this in. >> >> _Christian >> >>> >>> Doug. >>> >>> Christian Kelly wrote: >>>> Doug Leavitt wrote: >>>>> Hi Christian, >>>>> >>>>> I performed an svn ci with a new spec file >>>>> (actually an updated /contrib spec file) >>>>> dates.spec >>>>> >>>>> but it did not show up in the builds or other. >>>>> Please investigate. It looks like svn submissions >>>>> do not work at the moment. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Doug. >>>> >>>> Job 111, no? >>>> >>>> _Christian >>>> >> >> -- Release Engineer / Systems Administrator Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:Christian.Kelly at sun.com GNOME Desktop Team http://good-for-nothing.org/wp +353 1 819 9749 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
