---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Ashworth <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 8:00 PM
Subject: [sudan-john-ashworth] "Time to act on atrocities in Sudan"
To: Group <[email protected]>


Opinion: Time to act on atrocities in Sudan

Arab Spring offers opportunity for change in Sudan.

John PrendergastOctober 14, 2011 06:08
Global Post

WASHINGTON — Since South Sudan became the world's newest nation in
July, the state of Sudan it left behind has become engulfed in a civil
war of its government’s own making.

The Khartoum regime’s report card during the past four months includes
an invasion of Abyei, a war-crimes spree in the Nuba Mountains,
ongoing attacks against civilians in Darfur, and most recently an
assault on the Blue Nile border state.

It seems counterintuitive to proclaim this as an unprecedented moment
of opportunity for Sudan. Yet the combination of current internal,
regional and international variables could provide a real catalyst for
future peace in Sudan.

Internally, as armed or unarmed opposition to the regime grows daily,
a more united opposition advocating for structural change in Sudan is
emerging. Unlike the street revolutions beginning in Khartoum that
overthrew Sudanese dictatorships in 1964 and 1985, today’s dynamic is
very different, marked by a revolution of peripheral regions against
an exploitative, non-inclusive central government.

Regionally, Sudan is adrift in a sea of change. Egypt, Tunisia, Libya,
Syria, Bahrain, Yemen and others have been swept up by mass protests
and in a few cases, armed revolution. The Arab Spring is reverberating
throughout Sudan, though a specific direction has not yet fully
manifested itself. Rather than the street protests of Syria and Egypt,
the more likely scenario in Sudan is an increasingly coordinated armed
opposition focused on overthrowing the regime.

Internationally, the Arab Spring has produced major changes in U.S.
and European policy, with China and Russia even altering course when
their options have narrowed.

The international community’s abandonment of ousted Egyptian President
Hosni Mubarak and deposed Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi, and the
increasing isolation of Syrian President Bashar Assad have defied most
prognostications.

Dictators like Sudan President Omar al Bashir cannot be confident in
the face of this domino effect.

Furthermore, the success of focused interventions to protect civilians
in Benghazi, Libya and Abidjan, Ivory Coast, demonstrate that the
world is not powerless and not always unwilling to act in the face of
human rights atrocities. The apprehension of key war-crimes suspects
from the Balkans and Africa has breathed new life into international
accountability efforts.

The U.S.and Europe can play a major role in supporting the Sudanese
people as they strive for a positive outcome, but real changes must be
made in their policies toward Sudan.

The existing approach encapsulated in acceptance of an authoritarian
system and the pursuit of a series of stove-piped “peace processes”
for Darfur, Abyei, the Nuba Mountains and Blue Nile, and the East
weakens leverage and entrenches the fractured status quo.

The U.S. and other countries with leverage in Sudan should prepare and
present a clear choice for the Sudanese regime. A comprehensive peace
deal that addresses the grievances of the peripheral states in
rebellion, followed by internationally monitored elections, would
positively transform the relationship between a more democratic Sudan
and the broader international community.

On the other hand, further conflict, repression, and autocracy should
trigger rapid, meaningful, and escalating international consequences.

The Arab Spring, successful international efforts at civilian
protection, and the escalating multi-front civil war in Sudan, have
changed the framework for what the endgame should look like in Sudan.
The new goal for the U.S. and other governments of influence should be
a framework peace deal for all regions and genuinely free and fair
elections.

Time is of the essence.

Besieged civilian populations in the Nuba Mountains, Blue Nile,
Darfur, and Abyei require immediate protection and emergency
assistance. Very little is being done to meaningfully protect those
populations. Escalating financial sanctions should target those
officials most responsible for human-rights abuses, and a no-fly-zone
or destruction of offensive air capacities should be deployed
immediately to end aerial bombing of civilian centers.

President Obama has shepherded U.S. policy through three successful
efforts at civilian protection in the last year.

First, his diplomatic leadership helped to avert a war between North
and South Sudan through the timely and peaceful holding of the
referendum for Southern independence.

Second, he supported UN efforts at restoring democracy and countering
war crimes in Ivory Coast.

Third, his decisive action prevented massacres in Benghazi, Libya.
These successes, combined with support for regime change in Egypt and
Libya, may not provide a perfect parallel to the current situation of
multiple ongoing wars in Sudan, but they do illustrate the potential
for positive, sustainable change during this moment of crisis.

The Arab Spring provides an historic moment, and a significant, active
segment of the American public is strongly supportive of action to end
Sudan’s suffering.

All of these variables could add up to a real possibility for change
in Sudan as historic as that of neighboring Libya and Egypt, if the
moment is seized.

Prendergast is Co-founder of the Enough Project, an anti-genocide
group in Washington,D.C., and co-author of Unlikely Brothers.

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/opinion/111013/time-act-atrocities-sudan

END
______________________
John Ashworth

Sudan Advisor

[email protected]

+254 725 926 297 (Kenya mobile)
+249 919 695 362 (Sudan mobile)
+27 82 853 3556 (South Africa mobile)
+44 750 304 1790 (UK/international)
+88 216 4334 0735 (Thuraya satphone)

PO Box 52002 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya

This is a personal e-mail address and the contents do not necessarily
reflect the views of any organisation

--
The content of this message does not necessarily reflect John
Ashworth's views. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, John Ashworth is
not the author of the content and the source is always cited.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "sudan-john-ashworth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.za/group/sudan-john-ashworth

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to