South Sudan threatens to suspend oil production if north imposes
charges unilaterally
ArticleComments (37). Email PrintSave
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 30, 2011 (JUBA) – The South Sudan government on Wednesday
reacted negatively to reports that Sudan plans to take 23% of the new
country’s oil exports, saying it will consider suspending oil
production if north Sudan continues to impose high transportation and
refinery costs.


Sabir Mohamed Hassan, Sudan’s co-chair of negotiations on economic
issues, speaks at a news conference in Khartoum November 30, 2011
(Reuters)Agence France Presse (AFP) quoted an anonymous senior
official at north Sudan’s oil ministry as saying, "In the interim
period, we are not going to charge the full fee. We will deduct about
23 percent as payment in kind."

Talks between the North and South collapsed once again on Wednesday
after the African Union High Panel Implementation (AUHIP) failed to
resolve differences between two the countries.

Speaking to Sudan Tribune shortly after his arrival from the Ethiopian
capital Addis Ababa, Stephen Dhieu Dau, South Sudan’s oil minister
said no agreement has been reached on what his landlocked country
would pay as charges to Khartoum.

After South Sudan’s independence in July, the only way to export oil
has been through north Sudan. The new country has been pondering
building a pipeline that runs through neighboring Kenya will but
analysts say it will take years to build.

“To the best of my knowledge, there was no agreement on charges. The
Sudanese delegation did not accept our proposal. They insisted on
demanding $36 dollar per barrel. This was very expensive charge to
accept. So we reject their demand because it is discriminatory. It is
not a charged based on a cost principle," Dau said.

“This is a clear discrimination. They are [Khartoum] demanding charges
not based on any principle. This was [why we] did not reach any
compromise because they were not negotiating with us”, said the senior
member of the delegation.

Attempts by Sudan Tribune to reach Pagan Amum, the Secretary General
of South Sudan’s ruling Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) and
the leader of Juba’s delegation failed on Wednesday evening. His aides
said he was tired and resting.

Dau said that if Khartoum did not change its stance, South Sudan may
be forced to stop exporting oil through north Sudan. This week
Khartoum announced that it would stop allowing South Sudanese oil to
be exported through Port Sudan but then appeared to reverse its
position.

Sudan’s oil ministry said on Monday that it had blocked southern
exports, claiming the Juba government had failed to pay transit fees
of $727 million covering the period from July until the end of
October.

But a foreign ministry spokesperson said that north Sudan was
determined to get a percentage of South Sudan’s oil exports even if no
agreement has been reached on transit fees but without forcibly
closing the pipelines.

Less than five months ago South Sudan became the world’s newest
country after voting for independence in a January vote, taking with
it three-quarters of the country’s oil.

“There is no immediate alternative. The only option which I think will
not be in the best interest of both the north and us is to suspend oil
production because there are no storage facilities at the Port Sudan
export terminal”, Dau said.

The oil minister said his government did not want to stop exporting
oil but said that it was an option if Khartoum continues to prevent
oil from leaving the Port Sudan and reaching the international market.

In such a situation, “the only option will lead to full shutdown”, Dau said.

But Sabir Mohamed Hassan, Khartoum’s chief negotiator on economic
issues claimed, after returning from the talks in Ethiopia, that the
south was in fact continuing to ship its oil through the north.

"The south has access [to our facilities] and it will continue to
export, and it is in our interests that they continue to export
through our territory," he told a news conference.

"[But] we’ve told them that we have a responsibility to take our dues
in kind, and that is exactly what has happened in the past few days,"
he added.

Khartoum and Juba are locked in a bitter dispute over how much the
south, which gained independence in July and produced some 75 percent
of the country’s 450,000-500,000 barrels of oil per day before
independence, should pay to use the north’s infrastructure.

The escalating dispute prompted China, the largest foreign investor
and main buyer of Sudanese oil, to urge both sides on Tuesday to
"exercise restraint" in their negotiations.

The Chinese ambassador in Sudan Luo Xiaoguang described Khartoum’s
decision as “very serious and unjustified”.

Xiaoguang further told the pro-government al-Rayaam newspaper in
remarks published yesterday that there is no reason to stop the
exporting of oil as long as there are negotiations now underway
between the two countries in Addis Ababa.

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to