Security first, Sudan’s Bashir tells Mbeki

May 19, 2012 (KHARTOUM) – The chairman of the African Union High-Level
Implementation Panel (AUHIP) saw little change in Khartoum’s position
regarding the resumption of negotiations with Juba during his talks
today with Sudanese president Omer Hassan al-Bashir.
 FILE - Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir (R) meets with Chief African
Union mediator and former South African president, Thabo Mbeki (L) in
Khartoum on April 6, 2012 (AFP)
Mbeki’s visit comes more than two weeks after the United Nations
Security Council (UNSC) adopted a resolution demanding north and south
Sudan to sit down for talks on key post-independence issues including
oil, border demarcation, citizenship and Abyei. Both sides must reach
an agreement within three months after which the mediation would
propose its own solution to the deadlock.

The council threatened non-military sanctions on any party deemed not
to be in compliance with its decision.

While Sudan accepted the resolution it insisted that the issue of
security and particularly Juba’s alleged support to northern rebels be
tackled first before they move to other items.

The ruling National Congress Party (NCP) external relations secretary
Ibrahim Ghandour told reporters after the lengthy Mbeki-Bashir meeting
that the Sudanese leader underscored the importance of reaching a
permanent peace with South Sudan that guarantees no more attacks on
its territory.

Last month the Sudanese army managed to recapture the oil-rich region
of Heglig inside South Kordofan after South Sudan army (SPLA) briefly
seized it. The clashes ignited fears of the eruption of full-scare war
between the two countries.

Bashir told Mbeki that rapprochement with Juba requires ceasing
support to rebels, halting attacks near borders, honoring previous
border monitoring accords and withdrawing what Khartoum claims to be
the presence of 9th and 10th SPLA divisions inside Blue Nile and South
Kordofan states where Sudan army is battling rebels from SPLA-North
(SPLA-N) since last year.

The Sudanese leader expressed readiness to implement Mbeki’s proposal
of a demilitarized zone 10 kilometers inside each country’s borders.

Mbeki on his end mentioned Khartoum’s willingness to withdraw inside
1956 borders but it is not clear if that includes disputed Abyei
region which according to last year’s agreement requires both
countries to pull out their troops. This month Juba completed its
withdrawal but Khartoum refused to despite UNSC orders saying that
they will only do so after the establishment of administrative body
and complete deployment of Ethiopian peacekeepers.

The AUHIP chair will now travel to Juba for talks with senior
officials there amid growing hostility towards his mediation from
South Sudan. The latter has recently stepped up its criticism of Mbeki
suggesting that he is favoring Khartoum.

On Friday the South Sudan chief negotiator Pagan Amum called for
imposing sanctions on Khartoum saying they violated the UNSC timeline
for resuming negotiations with expired on Wednesday.

He criticized the UN and the AU for failing to deal firmly with Sudan
which he said routinely defied the international community.

"The UN sees it as normal for Bashir to bomb and kill the people of
South Sudan. The conscience of the international community is not
pricked ... they are used to it, it has become normal," he complained.

"If the UN fails to take action, they will be judged by humanity and
the people of South Sudan will lose trust and confidence in them,"
Amum said.

"We are going to ask them, ’What are you going to do?’” he posed the question.

The Sudanese foreign ministry described Amum’s remarks as
“unfortunate” and accused Juba of attacking Sudan’s territories.

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to