---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: PlusNews <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:25 PM
Subject: SOUTH AFRICA: Easy patents cost South African patients
To: Elisabeth Janaina <[email protected]>


SOUTH AFRICA: Easy patents cost South African patients

JOHANNESBURG, 5 November 2012 (PLUSNEWS) - South Africa grants almost
every patent application it receives, making its patent regime one of
the world's most lenient. While pharmaceutical companies cash in,
patients face staggering healthcare costs, and medicines like cancer
treatments, third-line antiretrovirals (ARVs) and treatments for
drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) are often priced out of reach.

A form of intellectual property protection, patents are typically
awarded to companies that can prove their product is new. Not so in
South Africa, say activists and researchers, who claim the country's
lax patent system allows pharmaceutical companies to apply for new
patents on existing drugs based on immaterial changes - like adding
table salt to a formulation or changing a pill's colour. [
http://www.scribd.com/doc/112153927 ]

According to activists from Médecins Sans Frontières's (MSF) Campaign
for Access to Essential Medicines and the South Africa AIDS lobby
group the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC), easy patents mean companies
can extend their exclusive right to manufacture and sell certain
drugs, a process known as evergreening.
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dm7tGRbP4M]

With competition eliminated, drug prices stay high - often out of
reach of South African patients, activists argue.

Substantial costs

In South Africa, third-line ARVs - all under patent - costs about
US$4,000 per patient per year in private-sector health facilities. [
http://www.plusnews.org/Report/91161/ZAMBIA-Ephraim-Banda-The-third-line-drugs-we-don-t-have
] This high cost means patients in need of these medicines, which are
considered drugs of last resort, often go without. The medicines
aren't offered by public health facilities, according to MSF and TAC.

Additionally, the country diagnoses about 45,000 cases of
multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) annually [
http://www.scribd.com/doc/112154586 ], but one of the few drugs
available to treat MDR-TB, linezolid, costs about $2,500 per month of
treatment because of patent protection. [
http://www.msfaccess.org/content/linezolid-treatment-complicated-drug-resistant-tuberculosis-systematic-review-and-meta
]Linezolid is also not available from public sector healthcare
providers.

While its patent expires in 2014, a patent on a crystallized form of
the drug may block generics from entering the South African market
until 2022. An Indian generic, currently restricted because of
linezolid's patent, costs about $70 per month.

The country is preparing a new draft policy on intellectual property,
so now is the time to fix the patent laws that allow for these high
prices, said Vuyiseka Dubula, TAC's secretary general.

"In the past 13 years, we have been fighting [patents] drug by drug.
Today is about fixing the problem once and for all, to deal with our
issues and ensure access to ARVs and DR-TB drugs," Dubula told
IRIN/PlusNews. "I'm saying this as a person openly living with HIV who
is alive today because of access to affordable medicines."

Patent reform will likely have implications for the government's
efforts to initiate local ARV production and implement national health
insurance - policy decisions announced by the National Department of
Health. The health department has little control over the country's
new intellectual patent policy, which is largely the domain of the
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI).

Easy come, easy go?

How easy is it to get a patent in South Africa? The Mailman School of
Public Health, at Columbia University in the US, examined about 2,400
patent applications filed with European Union, US and South African
patent regulators between 2000 and 2002. While European and American
officials approved about 60 percent of these applications, South
African patent administrators approved almost every application
submitted, according to the study's preliminary findings, which were
recently presented in Johannesburg by associate professor Bhaven
Sampat.

A study by South Africa's University of Pretoria found that 80 percent
of patents in South Africa would not have been granted if the country
actually scrutinized patent applications. [
http://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/17574 ] Study authors also
found that country's patent laws did not widely support local
innovation, but instead facilitated exploitation by foreign companies
and created substantial social costs.

The most recent review of South African patents, conducted in 2008 by
Yousuf Vawdaw, a professor of law at South Africa's University of
KwaZulu-Natal, found that about half of all South African patents that
year were granted to US companies, followed by companies from the UK,
Germany and France.

New policy to be released in December

The DTI's draft of the new intellectual property policy is set to be
submitted to the cabinet on 5 December. A three-month period of public
comment on the policy will then be opened before the policy becomes a
bill, according to MacDonald Netshitenzhe, the department's chief
director of policy and legislation.

Despite calls from organizations such as TAC and MSF, the draft policy
has not yet been made public, but Netshitenzhe says provisions to
oppose patents are in the draft policy. Vawdaw and other experts say
they hope the policy includes provisions to dissuade evergreening and
to allow for compulsory licences.

When the World Trade Organization (WTO) was created, it introduced
standards to protect intellectual rights through its Agreement on
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Aware
that the protection of intellectual property rights might hinder
access to public health resources such as generic medicines, the WTO,
in 2001, reaffirmed governments' right to use TRIPS's built-in
flexibilities to increase access to public health resources such as
essential medicines.

Compulsory licences are one of the most commonly used TRIPS
flexibilities. When it is in the national interest, governments in
countries with insufficient pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity can
authorize the use of a patent-protected invention without the consent
of the patent-holder. Patent holders are then compensated, usually in
the form of royalties.

Although historically opposed to compulsory licenses, the US issued
one for the drug Ciprofloxacin, an antibiotic used to treat anthrax,
in the wake of the September 11 attack. But DTI's Andre Kudlinski has
argued compulsory licenses are unnecessary when large pharmaceutical
companies like Aspen have received voluntary licenses on ARVs in the
past.

The 'BRICS' group of advanced emerging countries - Brazil, Russia,
India, China and South Africa - is coming under increased pressure to
impose stricter patent laws, particularly through fair trade
agreements, and Leena Menghaney, head of MSF's Access Campaign in
India, warns that the choices South Africa makes now may set the tone
for discussions in countries like Brazil and India.

llg/kn/rz

[END]

This report online: http://www.plusnews.org/report.aspx?reportID=96712



Follow us on Twitter! http://twitter.com/plusnews

© IRIN. All rights reserved. HIV/AIDS news and analysis:
http://www.plusnews.org/

[This item comes to you from PlusNews, part of IRIN, the humanitarian
news and analysis service of the UN Office for the Coordination of
Humanitarian Affairs. The opinions expressed do not necessarily
reflect those of the United Nations or its Member States. Reposting or
reproduction, with attribution, for non-commercial purposes is
permitted. Terms and conditions: http://www.irinnews.org/copyright

Principal IRIN/PlusNews donors: UAE, Canada, Germany, Ireland,
Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, UK and the IHC. More
information: http://www.irinnews.org/donors

This mail is from an automatic address. Contact PlusNews at:
[email protected]. Revise/stop your subscription:
http://bit.ly/9nCoUP ]

Subscribed email: [email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to