Sudan FM accuses some NCP figures of undermining country’s policy in Africa


March 23, 2013 (KHARTOUM) – The Sudanese foreign minister Ali Karti
criticized unspecified parties within the ruling National Congress
Party (NCP) and accused them of sabotaging Khartoum’s strategy to
strengthen ties with Africa.
Sudanese Foreign Minister Ali Karti (Getty Images)
"[S]ome voices are jamming our efforts to develop a strategy towards
Africa saying that we can’t depend on African countries because,
according to them, these countries are ‘puppets of the West ’. But
facts on the ground belie these misgivings" Karti said in an interview
with al-Sudani newspaper.

The Sudanese top diplomat said that African nations protected his
country from the International Criminal Court (ICC) and kept its
dispute with South Sudan on post-referendum issues away from
"internationalization".

He appealed for more time so that Sudan’s Africa strategy bears fruit.

"[W]e need at least three years to consolidate our strategy towards
Africa. When the strategy is implemented then any dissonance [from NCP
figures] won’t have a negative impact on our policies. Ill-informed
discourse hurts our work. As a responsible state we must rationalize
and adjust our discourse and link it to stable strategies," Karti
said.

Karti went on to say that some NCP parties are still embracing
"policies and ideas of the nineties" of when the Sudanese regime came
to power through an Islamist-backed coup.

 "Some circles want to divest us of our friends by antagonizing our
neighbors and destroying our leading role in Africa. These circles use
some extremists in the NCP to achieve its goals" the Sudanese foreign
minister said.

"I have no doubts that those who intend to hinder Sudan’s advancement
would use all means including extremists from our ranks" he added.

The minister then tackled the issue of negotiations with Sudan People
Liberation Movement North (SPLM-N) who are engaged in battles with
Khartoum in Blue Nile and South Kordofan.

Sudan has been strongly resisting regional and international pressure
to negotiate with SPLM-N rebels, calling its leaders outlaws and
issuing arrest warrants for them.

Officials in Khartoum say they fear being forced to sign a power and
wealth sharing arrangements similar to the ones sound with South
Sudan’s SPLM in 2005.

The SPLM-N fought alongside the South during its protracted civil war
with the north, with conflict flaring in 2011 between Khartoum and
rebels fighting for the removal of the Arab-dominated regime.

South Sudan armed and trained SPLM-N when it was part of the South’s
rebel force, but maintains it cut all military ties before its
independence in July 2011.

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolution issued in May
2012 ordered Sudan and the SPLM-N to cooperate in order to end the
conflict in the two regions.

Under the resolution, the two parties are supposed to negotiate on the
basis of the 28 June 2011 agreement they signed in Addis Ababa before
it was scrapped by Sudanese president Omer Hassan Al-Bashir.

"To my knowledge, the [NCP] supreme Bureau did not refuse to negotiate
with the SPLM-N; rather, it refused the framework agreement between
the government and the SPLM-North, better known as Nafie-Agar
agreement. It was a refusal of specific agreement not the principle of
negotiations" Karti said.

"Nafie-Agar agreement is not a revelation from heaven. We did not
refuse it totally, some of its provisions could be reviewed and if the
other party refuses revisions, it means they are intransigent" he
added.

This week the Sudanese defence minister Abdel-Rahim Mohamed Hussein
said Khartoum that it is “ready to negotiate with the SPLM-N” but only
based on the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA).

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to