Khartoum behind fresh wave of violence over gold in Darfur: report

May 17, 2013 (KHARTOUM) - A new report argues that the Sudanese
government’s struggle for control of Darfur’s gold resources, rather
than inter-tribal conflicts is behind the recent surge in violence in
the war-torn western region.
UNAMID forces from Rwanda patrol in a new area for families displaced
by the fighting over goldmines between Abbala and Beni Hussein at the
outskirts of El Sereif, North Darfur on 13 May 2013. (photo Albert
González Farran/UNAMID)
The report, titled Darfur’s Gold Rush: State-Sponsored Atrocities 10
Years after the Genocide, has cast doubt on official rhetoric from
Khartoum that tribal rivalries are to blame for rising instability.

It found that the Sudanese government is complicit in a violent power
play for control of North Darfur’s lucrative gold mines, as part of
its heightened economic interest in the region and an ongoing campaign
of “state-sponsored atrocity”.

According to the report released earlier this month by the US-based
Enough Project, Arab Abbala tribesmen are being armed by Khartoum as
part of a bid to wrest control of gold fields in Jebel Amer from the
Beni Hussein tribe, who are the traditional custodians of the area.

“While we do not have documented evidence that the government of Sudan
ordered the Abbala offensive, it’s clear that the historically
state-aligned tribe, with ties to the janjaweed, was not acting
without at least tacit government consent”, researchers noted.

VIOLENCE ESCALATES

The escalation of violence since January 2013 has plunged the region
into the worst humanitarian crisis in recent years.

The UN estimates that some 150,000 people have been displaced
following a spate of attacks by armed Abbala militias, elements of
which include the notorious janjaweed forces, which hit the headlines
10 years ago for brutal atrocities allegedly committed at the behest
of the Sudanese government.

The report argues that Khartoum has again reprised the role of Abbala
militia as a “tool of state repression”, suggesting the government is
employing the same “paralleling tactics” it used during the height of
the conflict in 2003-04.

“For over a decade, the government of Sudan has pursued a strategy of
economic plunder of the periphery through violence and forcible
demographic change”, the report said.

A sedentary farming and cattle-rearing Arab community, the Beni
Hussein have historically been exempted from attack by state-sponsored
militias. However, the recent discovery of gold reserves in their home
area, and intense economic pressure on the Sudanese government
following South Sudan’s secession and the subsequent loss of oil
revenues, has fundamentally altered that dynamic, the report said.

GOLD BOOM

Jebel Amer last year produced a third of Sudan’s gold, despite the
absence of major mining operations or foreign direct investment.

Satellite imagery included in the report shows evidence of the
presence of commercial mining equipment, as well as the transformation
of a relatively desolate area into a thriving mining outpost within a
few months.

Darfuri sources interviewed for the report also suggested that North
Darfur governor Osman Yosuf Kibir was interested in securing a stake
in the mines. However, due to the Beni Hussein’s control of the permit
process, Kibir was only able to obtain licences for less than 20
mining sites, even though he owns the pumps needed to operate far
more.

Researchers from the Enough Project say that during the height of the
latest round of violence, Abbala militia leaders spoke publicly on
Sudanese radio, bragging about their position within the state
security forces and in many instances used state-supplied vehicles and
weapons to conduct attacks.

Reports suggest that Abbala militiamen from across Darfur collected at
least 4,000 horses, 2,500 camels, and 130 government-owned vehicles to
carry out the attacks.

During a second wave of clashes in late February, hundreds of armed
Abbala militiamen attacked al-Sref Beni Hussein, where over 60,000
displaced people had sought refuge in the aftermath of the first wave
of attacks.

Internally displaced people interviewed by Amnesty International
following the attack, said that armed men arrived on 150 camels and
200 horses, as well as more than 40 four-wheel drive vehicles to
attack the town, leaving 53 dead and 66 injured, most of whom were
civilians, including women and children.

“A scattered power base in Khartoum means that the Sudanese government
no longer speaks with one voice. Instead, middle men and profiteers
within the ruling party have gained influence and control. These
elements see clear economic benefit from intense periods of violence,
particularly in places along Sudan’s marginalised periphery”, the
report said, which draws on extensive interviews with sources in
Darfur, Khartoum and the diaspora community.

As part of six key recommendations, the Enough Project calls on the US
and the international community to provide further support to
democratic forces within Sudan and apply pressure to the Sudanese
government to grant humanitarian agencies unfettered access to all
areas of Darfur.

It also calls on the United States and other partners to exert
pressure to ensure that those responsible for human rights abuses
during the latest wave of violence are held accountable.

The Enough Project says reconciliation pledges made between the Beni
Hussein and Abbala tribes must be honoured and that the international
donor community should work to promote Darfur’s economic growth
through sustainable and self-sufficient development.

It says companies in the gold supply chain should add Sudan to their
list of countries identified as high-risk originating points for gold
and that jewellers and gold exchanges “should conduct additional due
diligence on gold coming out of Sudan to avoid engaging in the
conflict gold trade”.

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to