Obama can only light up Africa with its own “leading lights” – Bright Simons

June 30, 2013

On the fourth day of President Obama’s 6-day Africa tour, his aides
say that he is scheduled to announce in Cape Town, South Africa, a new
US plan to advance the electrification of Africa.

Aides were sure to make it known that this is the ‘signature’ Obama
initiative for Africa that many have been expecting since he came to
office, and the absence of which has given rise to concern in certain
circles.

As one of the people who have in the past complained about the seeming
lack of new ideas for a “strategic engagement with Africa” from the
Obama White House, I welcome renewed energy towards that direction.

The issue selected – Africa’s electricity challenge – is clearly a
vital one. The World Bank for instance says that all sub-Saharan
African countries, minus South Africa, combined do not generate more
electricity than Argentina. Including South Africa, they produce only
as much as Spain.

It is commendable that the White House is pledging up to $7 billion in
additional funding from two of its overseas-focussed agencies – EXIM
and OPIC – for this cause.

I am sure that the White House is already aware that even if this
whole amount was provided in a single year, and it is more likely that
it will be provided over a 3 to 5 year timeframe, it will not be able
to dent the $23 billion YEARLY deficit in energy investment on the
continent.

Realistically, President Obama’s new initiative, standing alone, will
reduce the annual deficit in energy investment in Africa by 6.5% per
year over a 5-year period after which even more cash will need to be
injected to maintain the reduction in the deficit.

You can also look at it this way. If all the electricity generated in
Africa was shared equally, each household would have enough to power a
normal light-bulb for about 3.5 hours a day per person. With President
Obama’s new initiative, this can increase by roughly 18 more minutes
if implementation was perfect.

Because Africa’s electricity challenges are however not due to capital
investment in generation alone, implementation can never be perfect.
For example, if all the money being voted for this initiative was
spent on building power plants, as the preceding scenario assumes, one
will still have to contend with maintenance challenges and, connected
with that, efficient administration of the power system, including
investment in transmission and distribution, as well as government
policy on ensuring that people pay realistic prices for the power they
consume.

In many African countries this has been far from simple. Once these
factors are taken into consideration, it will be remarkable if the
initiative succeeds in providing 5 more minutes of electrical light
per person per African household per day.

But the Obama initiative need not become a drop in the bucket as such
calculations may, rather cynically and dryly, suggest. It can become a
catalyst or even a trigger for more investment from within and outside
Africa into the continent’s electricity infrastructure.

That will only happen if President Obama does not make this initiative
a ‘stand-alone’ effort. It must be integrated into the well-defined
and locally legitimate PIDA initiative of the NEPAD (New Partnership
for African Development). It should in particular focus on triggering
investment into the $80 billion REGIONAL Grand Inga Initiative that
has the capacity to double Africa’s current electricity production.

Such a US – NEPAD Electricity Initiative would have the remarkable
distinction of supporting home-grown African efforts to solve Africa’s
problems, and strengthen pan-African institutions in the fashion
President Obama has been so keen to support.

Even better, the growing pan-African young professionals’ engagement
with NEPAD means that a strategic tie-up between US Africa policy and
NEPAD will vindicate the third plank of the Obama “Africa Doctrine”:
“energising Africa’s Next Generation”.

Bright Simons is honorary Head of Research at IMANI, a think tank in
Accra, and the inventor of Africa’s home-grown ICT-based response to
the counterfeit medicines problem: www.mPedigree.Net

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oqUkVkVqBm3%2BA%2BsSO84yUfZrYuggF2jga_0ybqg5MAfsg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to