On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:04 AM, Jan Pazdziora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello John, > > I've noticed you've committed > > commit 1b3231475eb5805dbf5036674b25941c1a6ee0a6 > Author: John Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue Dec 9 18:54:11 2008 -0500 > > Adding a simple rpm for nutch > This RPM does not meet Fedora Guidelines, further it's not even > building nutch, instead it uses a nightly build from nutch's hudson. > It's a first cut at packaging nutch to allow further progress with > DocSearch for spacewalk 0.4. > > and the file > > spec-tree/nutch/nutch-2008-12-01_04-01-21.tar.gz > > has 70 MB. > > I generally wonder how correct it is to have the tarballs of this size > there. Especially looking at its name, it looks like some kind of > nightly build. So I assume it will get replaced eventually, and by > having it as tar.gz in there, the next check-in will again bring in > the whole 70 MB beast because git will not have a way of storing it > as a diff or sharing content of common files from those tarballs. > > Maybe we shouldn't store such things in git at all and just change the > make test-srpm / make srpm targets to download the Source0 thing from > the remote URL?
Probably a good idea, the issue is we have a lack of place to put such tarballs, so maybe a way of downloading it is better. > Or maybe we'd want to unpack that tar.gz, so that subsequent changes > can only store the diff? basically untar the file each time? that's also a valid option. > > By the way, > > $ find * -type f -print0 | xargs -0 ls -gG | sort -r -n -k 3 | head > -rw-rw-r-- 1 72641102 2008-12-10 09:39 > spec-tree/nutch/nutch-2008-12-01_04-01-21.tar.gz > -rw-rw-r-- 1 13782832 2008-09-17 11:38 > search-server/libsrc/icu4j-3_8_1-src.jar src for debugging, only contains *.java files in it. > -rw-rw-r-- 1 6846457 2008-09-17 11:38 documentation/javadoc/index-all.html odd thta this html file would come in as compressed > -rw-rw-r-- 1 5584791 2008-09-17 11:38 > search-server/libsrc/lucene-2.3.2-src.zip again src files. > -rw-rw-r-- 1 5120769 2008-12-09 15:32 > search-server/libsrc/nutch-2008-12-01_04-01-21-src.zip this looks like the new src zip for nutch, it should probably be trimmed down to only include the java files. The zip files we put in libsrc contain java source simply for debugging. > -rw-rw-r-- 1 5043664 2008-09-17 11:38 proxy/proxy-docs/RHN-reference-en.pdf > -rw-rw-r-- 1 2605125 2008-09-17 11:38 gzipstream/test/huge-all-zeros.txt.gz > -rw-rw-r-- 1 2055894 2008-09-17 11:38 > search-server/libsrc/nutch-1.0dev_2008_05_14-src.jar this -src.jar needs to get removed, it looks like the old one. > so we seem to have the nutch thing in there at least three times ... sort of :) but not really. jesus _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
