-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:24:06 +0100 Jan Pazdziora <jpazdzi...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:48:15PM -0400, Devan Goodwin wrote: > > FROM rhnSatelliteCert > > WHERE label = :label > > - - ORDER BY version DESC NULLS LAST > > + ORDER BY > > + CASE WHEN version IS NULL > > + THEN -1 > > + ELSE version > > + END > > + DESC > > > > Holler if you spot any problems. > > Can't we just use those two fields, in the ORDER BY query? What two fields? > > I do not like that use of -1, which I assume is in the domain of > the type of version. > It might work in this case now but it might > confuse people reading the code five years from now, and it might > confuse people who will be porting the NULLS LAST construct in > situation when the value of choice will actually be a possible > value of the column used. > Could you rephrase the last part of this? Devan - -- Devan Goodwin <dgood...@redhat.com> Software Engineer Spacewalk / RHN Satellite Halifax, Canada 650.567.9039x79267 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmIoWUACgkQAyHWaPV9my4/FACgpwcZoWV5lxwXZi28irjB8GzP 6CcAoMA3f3rIz/fFKRey8QUgn8o6mwF3 =C4Ti -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
