On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Michael DeHaan <mdeh...@redhat.com> wrote: > Cliff wrote: >> >> So, anyone looked at dojo in the pass? If so, thoughts on it? Could/would >> it replace our list tag? Make it better? Compatible licenses? >> >> The old age problem of how to represent lots of data in a timely manner to >> Spacewalk folks and allow them to sort/select/filter/paginate that data. >> >> Not saying 'we need to be using this!' - but more interested in what >> others think about it :) >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dojo_Toolkit >> >> Thanks, >> Cliff >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-devel mailing list >> Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel > > Sidenote, no Fedora packaging guidelines for javascript libraries yet -- > though one problem we face is that all the compressors are non-free, thus we > can't include the compressed versions > in any RPMs. Can you elaborate on this? I am not certain I understand it.
We ship rails, and rails includes prototype.js and such.... > > Personally I think this is a huge roadblock Fedora needs to solve somehow. > > Until then, apps could include such libraries but cannot package the > compressed versions IIRC. > > IMHO, javascript is a requirement for any modern web application, and those > that use things like NoScript would need to grant exemptions. > > --Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-devel mailing list > Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel > _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
