Hello, what is our position on the length of the %changelog section in our rpms? Now that we've released Spacewalk 1.0 and most core Spacewalk packages are in version 1.0, might it make sense to trim any changelog items for versions pre 1.0? Or maybe any changelog items older than say two years?
One of the reasons I care about the length of the changelog section of our rpms is that it pollutes our (Spacewalk's) database when such rpms are synced/pushed -- we store each item as separate record in rhnPackageChangeLog, and if new version of the same package is added, it generally contains all the versions that the previous version contained, plus one new item/record. Which of course we might want to refactor somehow, eventually. But still -- do we really need changelogs going all the way back? -- Jan Pazdziora Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
