On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:44:55AM -0400, Tomas Lestach wrote: > > Right, this approach is really not the best one. > As this is a part of the taskomatic, I'll investigate it more in detail. I'd > touch the code anyway. > Not sure if somebody makes use out of the rhnDaemonState table content, but > if not (what I suppose), I'd remove the table and the appropriate code. >
Tomáš, I've noticed that you've dropped the table for 1.3. However, doing git grep -i rhnDaemonState still shows it mentioned in the comments in multiple java/code/src/com/redhat/rhn/taskomatic/task/*.java files. Frankly, I'm a bit unsure that the comment refers to -- the whole class, the DISPLAY_NAME string, the getLogger ... Could you please look at it and clean it up or something? Thank you, -- Jan Pazdziora Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel