On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:44:55AM -0400, Tomas Lestach wrote:
>
> Right, this approach is really not the best one.
> As this is a part of the taskomatic, I'll investigate it more in detail. I'd
> touch the code anyway.
> Not sure if somebody makes use out of the rhnDaemonState table content, but
> if not (what I suppose), I'd remove the table and the appropriate code.
>
Tomáš,
I've noticed that you've dropped the table for 1.3. However, doing
git grep -i rhnDaemonState
still shows it mentioned in the comments in multiple
java/code/src/com/redhat/rhn/taskomatic/task/*.java
files. Frankly, I'm a bit unsure that the comment refers to -- the
whole class, the DISPLAY_NAME string, the getLogger ...
Could you please look at it and clean it up or something?
Thank you,
--
Jan Pazdziora
Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
