On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:08:41PM -0500, R P Herrold wrote: > > Checking the open bugs [1] I see only one that really seems relevant > to de-coupling the database from the Oracle backend to a more FOSS > license one (pgsql) [2]
We now track it as RFE. We don't actually need it -- it's a nice-to-have, it would make things cleaner. > Is there a tracking bug that is actually being worked, on this, > which I am missing? Which "this"? The refactoring of spacewalk-setup is not currently being worked on. > this one has been re-targetted a couple of > times and seems not to be the one to look at Right. It's not a priority but of course, patches are welcome. > I see also another piece of low hanging need in [3] 'Migrate SysV > script to support systemd at Fedora17' in an uncompleted status, but > which has a patch attached I assume Marcelo will review that patch eventually. I assume it's not correct because it does not expose the individual services that create Spacewalk (taskomatic, osa-dispatcher) to systemd, with proper dependencies and such, instead it cements the notion of Spacewalk as a single unit/service. -- Jan Pazdziora Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
