> On 08/21/2013 01:57 PM, Tomas Lestach wrote: > > Does this mean the reproducer is wrong? Shall I take two packages > > of same > > name, arch and evr? xulrunner-devel-17.0.5-1.el6_4-x86_64 and > > xulrunner-devel-17.0.5-1.el6_4-x86_64 (let's say signed with > > another gpg key)? > > Exactly - the problem arises when both a new package in an updated > errata and a package already present in a less recent, cloned errata > have identical (name, evr, arch). I apologize for my first > explanation > and examples not being clear enough.
Committed as: ae632715f97f67a8443d9d17657fd4198f4eeac3 Thank you! > > > Actually it should not be possible to change the content of RHEL > > channels, > > so if you found a way how, please, let me know. > > In our case, the vendor simply changed a patch, adding packages. > Custom > channels/patches could also run in the same issue. I see. :-) Regards, -- Tomas Lestach Red Hat Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
