James Hogarth wrote: % On 11 May 2010 02:41, Daniel Wittenberg <[email protected]> wrote: % > Do you mean the last sync time? There isn't one since there's a CLI script that does it, modified from the docs on syncing rpmforge/epel. % > % > The taskomaticd is running if that's the one you mean % > % > There are a few older errors "Error com.redhat.rhn.taskomatic.task.RepoSyncTask - Content Source could not be found: 521" % > % > I did change the local repo to a URl, and trying to sync that way, and it says "Sync scheduled" but the checkbox on the "Sync repo" goes away on page refresh and it doesn't actually sync. % > % > If I sync manually, the packages show up, but doesn't actually work. % > % > Dan % > % % Internally to spacewalk-repo-sync and rhnpush use the same API? I % can't recall if there are internal differences between them...
No, spacewalk-repo-sync pushes packages directly to database nad filesystem (thus must be run on spacewalk server locally) while rhnpush uses XMLRPC API and can be run from another box. % As a test (to determine a spacewalk or other issue) might be worth % using rhnpush to push packages into a channel and then seeing if % taskomatic kicks off the repo generation properly. % % James Regards, -- Michael Mráka Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
