Will upgrading Spacewalk 1.1 to 1.2 reduce database size consumption, or will a fresh install of 1.2 be required?
Edward Dore Freethought Internet ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Mraka" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, 8 November, 2010 10:00:49 AM Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] The request exceeds the maximum allowed database size of 4 GB\n Gregory Machin wrote: % Hi. % % I'm reposync-ing 4 repositories and now I'm getting this " (12952, % 'ORA-12952: The request exceeds the maximum allowed database size of 4 % GB\n', 'insert into rhnPackageCapability (id, name, version) values % (:id, :name, :version)') " . % I wouldn't haven't thought that meta data would have consumed 4G already . % % I'm not going to get permission for a Licience for Oracle, how do I % get this to work ? I did try the Postgresql but couldn't get it to % install correctly due to issues in the sql install script and missing % columns in the database .. % % % How do I resolve this ? https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/OracleXeSetup Troubleshooting If you run out of space in Oracle XE you can try and reclaim some space by shrinking your storage: Administration > Storage > Compact Storage in XE webUI (http://your.satellite.tld:9055/apex/). You can also prurge old data (channels and systems). If nothing above helps you have to wait for upcomming Spacewalk 1.2 which is going to significantly lower database size consumption. There also will be improved PostgreSQL version; still not 100% ready but you can expect decent stability somewhere between alfa and beta version. Regards, -- Michael Mráka Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
