Hi,
Any news on this one? I'm planning to add centos management in my
setup..so I need this to be fixed.
If you need any help, I can provide some. Andy, how do you plan to fix this?

Thanks,

Pierre

2012/1/27 Nilton Moura <red...@nmoura.eti.br>:
> Thank you.
>
> I'm trying to do this, but I guess you will finish early. How do you think
> you'll do this? With a new method or only changing the script? I'm searching
> a method to acomplish, but on getDetails for instance, I need to know the
> id. So, if I lookup with Nvrea and check the vendor or provider with
> getDetails, and after come back to a new lookup with Nvrea.. but I think
> this shouldn't work cause it will bring the same result, and sounds ugly
> too.
>
> Can you give me some light?
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2012/1/27 Speagle, Andy <andy.spea...@wichita.edu>
>
>> Hi Nilton,
>>
>>
>>
>> That’s a good catch… that has never been an issue for me since I don’t
>> have mixed vendors on my system.  I’ll get this updated and put out a patch
>> as soon as I can.  Thanks for sharing your usage case.
>>
>>
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>> From: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com
>> [mailto:spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Nilton Moura
>> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 11:49 AM
>> To: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
>> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Clone errata with pkgs of another channel.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>>
>>
>> I've been reading the python-clone-errata.py and I see that it uses the
>> findByNvrea method. Can I create another method like this, adding vendor or
>> provider parameter? I guess this will solve my problem, which is the first
>> entry matched on database is returned, no matter the channel. (I debug with
>> some prints on the script and comparing with the id's on the database).
>>
>>
>>
>> If not, the another "solution" (workaround), is to first upload packages
>> from RHN than the CentOS for example (but this sounds very ugly).
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nilton Moura.
>>
>> 2012/1/26 Nilton Moura <red...@nmoura.eti.br>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm cloning erratas from RHN with rhn-clone-errata.py 0.9.0 by Andy
>> Speagle, but some erratas are being associated with packages from another
>> channel (when the same package exist on CentOS for example).
>>
>>
>>
>> For example, after publish the errata RHSA-2012:0060 from
>> rhel-5-x86_64-server, I go to Packages and the GUI shows me only one package
>> (openssl-0.9.8e-20.el5_7.1-i686), but if I go to Packages in Manage Errata,
>> the list appears different:
>>
>>
>>
>> openssl-0.9.8e-20.el5_7.1-i686 RHEL x86_64 Server (v. 5) rhn
>>
>> openssl-0.9.8e-20.el5_7.1-x86_64 CentOS x86_64 (v. 5) updates
>>
>> openssl-devel-0.9.8e-20.el5_7.1-i386 CentOS x86_64 (v. 5) updates
>>
>> openssl-devel-0.9.8e-20.el5_7.1-x86_64 CentOS x86_64 (v. 5) updates
>>
>> openssl-perl-0.9.8e-20.el5_7.1-x86_64 CentOS x86_64 (v. 5) updates
>>
>>
>>
>> I uploaded two prints with this to better understanding:
>>
>>
>>
>> -> http://static.inky.ws/image/1180/image.jpg
>>
>> -> http://static.inky.ws/image/1181/image.jpg
>>
>>
>>
>> If I manually remove this CentOS packages from the errata and add the
>> corrected packages from rhel channel I correct this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nilton Moura.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Reply via email to