Hi, Thomas. I'm virtually positive I used IA-32. I tried x86_64 architecture, and the sync did seem to work, to the extent that I can see the packages listed in the repo. However (you saw this coming, right?), that channel is greyed out, and hence unavailable, to my 32-bit boxes.
Dimitri On Tuesday 06 August 2013 8:56:49 am Thomas Foster wrote: > When you created the channel befoee did you use ia or > x86_64..I have 32bit rpms in my x86_64 repo..so try > creating a new repo and assign the arch as 86_64 and sync > > On Aug 6, 2013 8:51 AM, "Dimitri Yioulos" <dyiou...@onpointfc.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply, Paul. > > > > Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case for me. > > If I run the sync from the command line, it completes > > in seconds with the X86_64 error message (syncing from > > the GUI also doesn't work, obviously). Also, in the > > "Full Software Channel List", while other channels show > > the number of packages acquired during the sync, the > > Samba channel shows a zero. It seems I've tried > > every combination of entry when creating the > > channel/repo, and it errors, one way or the other. > > What really ticks me off is that I once had the channel > > working. I just don't remember how. Arrrrgh! > > > > Dimitri > > > > > > On Monday 05 August 2013 7:07:18 pm Paul Robert Marino > > > > wrote: > > > The error message isn't wrong the repo on the site is > > > just strange. All that means is it can't sync the > > > X86_64 packages so it will ignore them the rest > > > should sync fine. > > > > > > I get the same error from HP's ProLiant repos because > > > it contains source rpms however the channels in > > > spacewalk still work despite the errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Sent from my HP Pre3 > > > > > > On Aug 5, 2013 18:10, Thomas Foster > > > <thomas.foste...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > change the architecture to x86_64 for the repo..then > > > try and sync > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Dimitri Yioulos > > > <dyiou...@onpointfc.com> wrote: > > > > > > On the Spacewalk server? > > > > > > With respect, what difference should it make? The > > > Spacewalk server is built on CentOS 6, but has > > > Spacewalk repos for CentOS 5 that sync just fine. > > > > > > Dimitri > > > > > > On Monday 05 August 2013 4:34:10 pm Thomas Foster wrote: > > > > What's the output of yum repolist ? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Dimitri Yioulos > > > > > > <dyiou...@onpointfc.com>wrote: > > > > > Thomas, > > > > > > > > > > Yes, and yes. > > > > > > > > > > Dimitri > > > > > > > > > > On Monday 05 August 2013 4:00:26 pm Thomas > > > > > Foster > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Did you just add the repo? If so, did you yum > > > > > > clean metadata? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Lewis Donofrio > > > > > > > > > > <lewis.donof...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > I'm new here but why not use 2nd party > > > > > > > Centos repo's for samba? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > ____________________________________________ > > > > > > >____ ___ > > > > > > > > > > > > > >____ ____________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.vizify.com/lewis-donofrio - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 734-743-1743 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Dimitri > > > > > > > Yioulos > > > > > > > > > > <dyiou...@onpointfc.com>wrote: > > > > > > >> H, all. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I recently upgraded Spacewalk to the latest > > > > > > >> and greatest from version 1.8. > > > > > > >> Unfortunately, the upgrade didn't go well, > > > > > > >> and all of my settings were lost. The > > > > > > >> silver lining here is that, by recreating > > > > > > >> everything, I learned a lot (or, at least, > > > > > > >> refreshed my memory). > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> However, I'm having a problem getting on > > > > > > >> recreated cahnnel/repo working. Many of > > > > > > >> our Linux boxes use Samba; the packages > > > > > > >> come from Sernet. I created the channel > > > > > > >> and repo for my CentOS 5 systems, but the > > > > > > >> repo won't sync. When I try to sync from > > > > > > >> the command line, here's the output I get: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> spacewalk-repo-sync --channel > > > > > > >> sernet-samba-el5 --type yum Repo URL: > > > > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5 > > > > > > >> Packages in repo: 22 > > > > > > >> Packages already synced: 0 > > > > > > >> Packages to sync: 22 > > > > > > >> 1/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 > > > > > > >> 2/22 : > > > > > > >> samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 3/22 > > > > > > >> : > > > > > > >> libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 > > > > > > >> 4/22 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> : libwbclient0-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 > > > > > > >> : 5/22 > > > > > > >> : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 > > > > > > >> : 6/22 samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 > > > > > > >> : 7/22 : > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 8/22 : > > > > > > >> samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 > > > > > > >> 9/22 : > > > > > > >> samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 > > > > > > >> 10/22 : > > > > > > >> samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 11/22 > > > > > > >> : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 > > > > > > >> 12/22 : > > > > > > >> samba3-winbind-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 > > > > > > >> 13/22 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 14/22 > > > > > > >> : : > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 15/22 : > > > > > > >> samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 > > > > > > >> 16/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 > > > > > > >> 17/22 : > > > > > > >> samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 18/22 > > > > > > >> : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 > > > > > > >> 19/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 > > > > > > >> 20/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 > > > > > > >> 21/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 > > > > > > >> 22/22 : > > > > > > >> libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 > > > > > > >> Linking packages to channel. > > > > > > >> ERROR: Package arch x86_64 incompatible > > > > > > >> with channel sernet-samba-el5 > > > > > > >> Sync completed. > > > > > > >> Total time: 0:00:06 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> The machines to be updated are 32-bit. I > > > > > > >> chose IA-32 as the Architecture, and the > > > > > > >> repo url is > > > > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5. > > > > > > >> If I make it > > > > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5/i > > > > > > >>386, I get "ERROR: Cannot retrieve > > > > > > >> repository metadata (repomd.xml) for > > > > > > >> repostory: sernet-samba-el5. Please verify > > > > > > >> its path and try again. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> What's frustrating is that I did have this > > > > > > >> working before. Any help would be greatly > > > > > > >> appreciated. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Dimitri > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > >> This message has been scanned for viruses > > > > > > >> and dangerous content by MailScanner, and > > > > > > >> is believed to be clean. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> ___________________________________________ > > > > > > >>____ Spacewalk-list mailing list > > > > > > >> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > > > > > > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spa > > > > > > >>cewa lk- list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________ > > > > > > >___ Spacewalk-list mailing list > > > > > > > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spac > > > > > > >ewal k-l ist > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > > > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > > > > believed to be clean. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Spacewalk-list mailing list > > > > > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewal > > > > >k-li st > > > > > > -- > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > > believed to be clean. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Spacewalk-list mailing list > > > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-lis > > >t > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Spacewalk-list mailing list > > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list