As said, I applied both in sequence. Patch #1 did not help. Patch #2 also
did not help. My process for this was:

git clone -b SPACEWALK-2.1 https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk
cd spacewalk/search-server/spacewalk-search/
[apply patch]
tito build --rpm --test
[transfer rpm to app server]
rpm -ev spacewalk-search
rpm -ivh [local spacewalk-search package]
/etc/init.d/rhn-search cleanindex

The relevant piece that I expected to change did not and looks like this:

jdbcUrl -> jdbc:postgresql:swdb00

My current server that I'm migrating away from (mentioned in my original
post) appears to have the full URL (
https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2014-September/msg00114.html
):

 jdbcUrl -> jdbc:postgresql://my_database_host:5432/swdb00

Any other thoughts on what might be going wrong?

- Jeremy

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Tomas Lestach <tlest...@redhat.com> wrote:

> > To be more specific and to correct my previous post, I made the
> > following changes:
> >
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=931659&action=diff
> >
> >
> https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/commit/4073abaf7bc7f17b738bcc0ca64e657ab9d074bf
> >
> >
> >
> > I did these separately and tried both methods, neither adjusted where
> > rhn-search looked for the database.
>
>
> Hello,
>
> bugzilla patch in Comment#1 isn't correct. I would not apply it.
> The github patch should be sufficient for rhn-search to connect to
> external PG database.
>
>
> Regards,
> --
> Tomas Lestach
> Red Hat Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Reply via email to