It looks like there aren't too many things that insert into the rhnServerNeededCache. ./java/code/src/com/redhat/rhn/manager/errata/cache/ErrataCacheManager.jav a calls some queries directly to insert into the table, and the update_needed_cache stored procedure could also be a cause.
I've cleared out the table rows for some server/package combos in our environment that I know are invalid, and I'll see if the entries get repopulated for those combos during the next sync or at other times. That will hopefully help narrow down the possibilities. Most of those table inserts appear to have to do with the errata cache management so maybe there's something in there that was missed during the PR500 fixes. -----Original Message----- From: Paul-Andre Panon <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 4:51 PM To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Ubuntu 18.04 package management in Spacewalk 2.8 Earlier today I wrote about the changes in PR500. That parsing actually seems to be OK after all because the EVR entries in the database are OK. That said, it looks like the spurious package entries are due to spurious entries in the rhnServerNeededCache table. So the question is what is populating the rhnServerNeededCache table incorrectly, and why? _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
