Paul Greene: > I probably jumped the gun on the slow response rate of the remote tasks I'd > scheduled - they eventually did kick in > > But, if anyone has some input on whether or not there's likely to be an > issue because I didn't update the clients, I'd eagerly appreciate some > feedback. ... > > Maybe I'm overthinking it, but I'm wondering if not updating any of the > > client packages to 2.9 is going to cause any issues that aren't initially > > apparent. I tried to push out some remote commands to a group of 7 systems, > > and I usually start seeing some successful and/or failed actions within > > maybe 15 minutes or so, but it's been about an hour and a half now and > > there hasn't been any movement yet on the remote tasks. > > > > Can anyone think of any potential issues I might be running in to taking > > this route?
Generally Spacewalk server and clients of different version are compatible. If not clients would complain in the log (during each rhn_check). AFAIK there were no API change since 2.7. Regards, -- Michael Mráka System Management Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list