Hi, I did directly remove the corresponding repodata directory, so in your case /var/cache/rhn/repodata/debian-9, and to trigger a regeneration, an "apt clean all && apt update" on a debian 9 registered on your spacewalk should do the trick.
Philippe. On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 17:53, <javier.flo...@gmz.migros.ch> wrote: > Hi > > > > I am trying to get Spacewalk to play with Debian and I am facing the same > problem (/var/cache/rhn/repodata/debian-9/Packages.gz is empty and doesn’t > get changed even after syncing new packages). > > > > How did you regenerate the repodata? I tried with spacecmd > softwarechannel_regenerateyumcache but that didn’t work on my server. > > > > Regards, > > Javier > > > > *Von:* spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com < > spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com> *Im Auftrag von *philippe bidault > *Gesendet:* Wednesday, July 31, 2019 5:16 PM > *An:* spacewalk-list@redhat.com > *Betreff:* Re: [Spacewalk-list] Debian package comparison failing. > > > > Thanks Robert, good catch. Indeed, the Packages file was not complete, > seems that it was built during the reposync process of the repository as > lots of package was missing in the repodata. > > I did force Spacewalk to regenerate it, and all good now. > > > > Regards, > > Philippe. > > > > On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 13:22, Robert Paschedag <robert.pasche...@web.de> > wrote: > > Please check, that you repo metadata has been correctly regenerated. Might > be, that within the channel, the new package is there, but the metadata has > not been refreshed (the Packages.gz) is still old. > > Robert > > sent from my mobile device > > > -------- Originale Nachricht -------- > Von: philippe bidault <philippe.bida...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Wed Jul 31 08:30:07 GMT+02:00 2019 > An: spacewalk-list@redhat.com > Betreff: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Debian package comparison failing. > > Hi Robert, > > No, this is so strange, absolutely no trace through apt of the new packages > proposed by Spacewalk on the Debian server. I need to troubleshoot this > deeper. > > root@debian10:~# apt-cache show python-gobject > Package: python-gobject > Status: install ok installed > Priority: extra > Section: oldlibs > Installed-Size: 323 > Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers < > pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> > Architecture: all > Source: pygobject > Version: 3.22.0-2 > Depends: python-gi (>= 3.22.0-2), python-gobject-2 > Description: Python 2.x bindings for GObject - transitional package > This package will bring the two versions of GObject Python modules: the > deprecated gobject module, and the new gobject-introspection system. It > is here for upgrade purposes only. You can remove it safely when > nothing else depends on it. > Description-md5: 0972cedec40e0869495e1025aa320af1 > Homepage: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/PyGObject > > Regards, > Philippe. > > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 21:53, Robert Paschedag <robert.pasche...@web.de> > wrote: > > > You can also try to install one of the packages with "apt-get -o > > Debug::pkgProblemResolver install ..." > > > > Robert > > > > sent from my mobile device > > > > > > -------- Originale Nachricht -------- > > Von: philippe bidault <philippe.bida...@gmail.com> > > Gesendet: Tue Jul 30 17:36:34 GMT+02:00 2019 > > An: spacewalk-list@redhat.com > > Betreff: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Debian package comparison failing. > > > > Nop, no lock or nothing similar: > > > > root@debian10:~# dpkg -l | grep python-eth > > ii python-ethtool 0.12-1.1 amd64 > > Python bindings for the ethtool kernel interface > > > > Regards, > > Philippe. > > > > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 15:02, Michael Mraka <michael.mr...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > philippe bidault: > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > > > Here are the installed versions: > > > > > > > > root@debian10:~# dpkg -l | grep python-go > > > > ii python-gobject 3.22.0-2 all > > > > Python 2.x bindings for GObject - transitional package > > > > ii python-gobject-2 2.28.6-13 amd64 > > > > deprecated static Python bindings for the GObject library > > > > root@debian10:~# dpkg -l | grep python-eth > > > > ii python-ethtool 0.12-1.1 amd64 > > > > Python bindings for the ethtool kernel interface > > > > > > > > So this is in fact matching what appears in the "Installed Package" > > > column > > > > in the Spacewalk web console. The Debian 10 client just does not see > > the > > > 3 > > > > updates. > > > > > > Can't they be somehow excluded / version-locked / ... etc? > > > If you use dpkg to list all available python-ethtool packages can you > see > > > python-ethtool-0.14-1 among them? > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Philippe. > > > ... > > > > > > Latest Package > > > > > Installed > > > > > > Package > > > > > > python-ethtool-0.14-1.amd64-deb > > > > > > python-ethtool-0.12-1.1.amd64-deb > > > > > > python-gobject-3.30.4-1.all-deb > > > > > > python-gobject-3.22.0-2.all-deb > > > > > > python-gobject-2-2.28.6-13+b1.amd64-deb > > > > > > python-gobject-2-2.28.6-13.amd64-deb > > > > > > > > > > > > But on the registered debian 10 server, "apt update" is telling > me > > > that > > > > > all > > > > > > the packages are already up-to-date. > > > > > > > > > > What version of python-ethtool, python-gobject and > python-gobject-2 > > > > > do you have installed on the debian server? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > -- > > > Michael Mráka > > > System Management Engineering, Red Hat > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Spacewalk-list mailing list > > > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Spacewalk-list mailing list > > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Spacewalk-list mailing list > > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list