On Fri, 14 May 2010, Andrew Daviel wrote: > Yes. That was trivial; there were various other changes I made > including the ability to have per-user configurable reject scores, > so that spam-lovers would be happy (if there are still such; in the > past we've had people who don't want any of their mail filtered at > all - though we bounce a lot with the CBL blacklist, too)
It would probably be nice to get these patches contributed back as much as possible; I'm personally interested in some of them. Don Armstrong -- Build a fire for a man, an he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. -- Jules Bean http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu _______________________________________________ Spamass-milt-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list
