Tony Shadwick
On 06/08/2010 03:36 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010, Tony Shadwick wrote:
 > I'm puzzled then - I think I need to go dig up the sources precisely
 > being used there. I'm working from 0.3.1, and it looked as though
 > sendmail, albeit with a hard-coded path, was being called from the
 > command line still, and the vulnerability was still present. If so,
 > then no wonder.

Right; spamass-milter hasn't had a release in a while (0.3.1 was
released in 2006), so versions that I (Debian) and Fedora work on have
diverged slightly.

 > Sorry Don, I'm not trying to be combative, was a bit frustrated
 > earlier.

No worries; I'm just being less verbose because I'm always short on
time.


Don Armstrong

--
Miracles had become relative common-places since the advent of
entheogens; it now took very unusual circumstances to attract public
attention to sightings of supernatural entities. The latest miracle
had raised the ante on the supernatural: the Virgin Mary had
manifested herself to two children, a dog, and a Public Telepresence
Point.
-- Bruce Sterling, _Holy Fire_ p228

http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu

_______________________________________________
Spamass-milt-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list


For my, and anyone else's, reference, where is the best place to get the most current sources? Is it still the repo on Savanna?


FYI - the patch I posted was full of logical holes anyway that I've worked out. Hopefully the adjustments required to adapt to the new code appropriately (and securely!) won't be too great.

Tony Shadwick

_______________________________________________
Spamass-milt-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list

Reply via email to