On Wednesday 31 December 2003 00:37 CET Sander Striker wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 00:34, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 December 2003 13:52 CET Sander Striker wrote:
> > > I'd personally go for the latter, but I can't speak for the SA
> > > committers. I wonder how long it will take for a svnpatch utility to
> > > appear ;)
> >
> > See [1]:
> > | In the future, the Subversion project plans to use (or invent) an
> > | expanded patch format that describes tree-changes.
> >
> > Hopefully soon implemented :)
>
> That's been in the book for a month or six I guess...
I'm still reading the book and coincidentally got to that paragraph just
after I read your mail :)
> We've talked a
> lot about changeset formats on a dedicated list, but there hasn't been
> time to actually come to a conclusion and implement something.
Hmmm... as patch tend to ignore anything it doesn't know, ... but I guess
you've already discussed this to the end so I keep my mouth shut and won't
repat all the ideas you already had :)
> Hopefully 1.0 will give some breathing room for new features.
Just out of interest: Is there any (roughly) planned release date?
Cheers,
Malte
--
[SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
<http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>
[ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way"
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
