On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:31:22PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote: > Yep, agreed. And this is why I think we may not be able to maintain 2.6x > in the apache.org SVN repository; because it will contain non-CLA'd > portions.
But the code is already in the repo, and if we keep it up to date with CVS, it'll be non-CLA code as well. So we'd either have to start the SVN repo with 2.70, or we're just going to have non-CLA code in there. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Programming is like sex. One mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life." - Michael Sinz
pgphlNo3y4ZPZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
