http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-08 17:49 ------- Subject: Re: AWL Tests Running in Random Order On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:23:42PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-08 17:28 ------- > Created an attachment (id=1670) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1670&action=view) > --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1670&action=view) > Proposed Patch > > Proposed Patch. This basically reverts some, but not all of the changes from > 2459. Removing the eval code from EvalTests and putting it back into > PerMsgStatus. It retains the elimination of the -a command line. It also > keeps a description of the AWL test so that it can be translated, not sure > about this part. > I can think of another way to go if we want to keep it setup as an eval test. One way would be to so something similar to the RBL tests now, create a new test type (TYPE_AWL_EVALS) and split off the auto whitelist test in Conf and then make a specific call in PerMsgStatus after all other tests have run. Or, create a new config type for running after all the other checks: after SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAME eval:name_of_eval_method([arguments]) and do pretty much the same thing. Michael ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
