On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:58:27PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> One we forgot -- the SAProxy list.
> 
> Since SAProxy won't be coming along to Apache since one of the main
> authors was not happy to relicense, I guess we should leave the list
> here with its sourcecode on sf.net.
> 
> Agreed?

yep.  saproxy is on its own.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
People who understand context would be steamed to have someone else
 dictating how they can call it.
              -- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: pgpxpAXFdg7MZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to