-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 01:35:50AM -0800, Dan Quinlan wrote: > > > 1. the message object passed in from the user: MsgParser? > > > > Question: should it just be named "Message" ? > > Well, I'm changing the API again anyway... (I talked this over with JM > anyway...) > > The way it is now, you call MsgParser::parse() with the message, and it > returns a MsgContainer object which is the root of the parse tree. > > The new way is basically the same, except you call M::SA::parse() with > the message, and it'll return a <insert name here -- Message?> object. > The goal being that we can change the backend in the future without > needing to change the user-facing API again. Yeah, +1 to this IMO. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAMpe4QTcbUG5Y7woRAuJxAKCc4B2CFyhyWegBkDubDRnI5MFukwCfcREo 5FuZZKLIn6jFnbQgutb/7Io= =Zly/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
