I did specify the full path though... I have something like
execl("/bb/bin/spamc", "-p", "12345"...). and the exit code I got is
always 69 (service not available). Even if I put an invalide option "-a",
still got the same exit code.
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:45:04 -0500, "Theo Van Dinter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 10:35:34AM -0500, Danny Chen wrote:
> > Thanks... That's going to work... But what I don't understand is that why
> > spamc doesn't take the -p (or any other run time option) with execl--
> > execl("spamc", "-p", "12345",NULL). Is this because I send the input file
> > via stdin, not '<', and spamc looks for '<' explicitly?
>
> I think the problem is more of execl wanting a full path, but you're
> only specifying the program name. Perhaps you want execlp()?
>
> The options in the exec look fine otherwise.
>
> > Also, if I link my code with modified spamc code, how is this going to
> > work with upgrading to higher version? Do I need to touch code again with
> > upgrade? -Danny
>
> Maybe, it depends. It's like using any other library. I don't think
> we've changed the API in the libspamc code in a while though, but then
> again it's not my puppy ...
>
> --
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> "They won't run unix, but look on the bright side, they won't run
> Windows either." - Martha Driscoll talking about
> 286s
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own
