http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3131
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-06 16:26 -------
Well, here's my 2 cents:
1) it used to be that the tests would run over the whole thing at once. that
blew up horribly due to RE issues/backtracking/etc. that's when we went to
doing things by paragraph.
2) besides your example, the current system works very well.
3) you're upset that <P> makes lines treated as different paragraphs, but
that's
what <P> does -- makes different paragraphs.
4) "Do we expect the spammers to purposely code their spams to make them easy
for SA to detect?" The answer of course is no, but what you're looking for
isn't really a spamsign, so ...
5) I agree that full is not appropriate for "simple" tests, that's not what
it's
meant to be used for. I'd actually like to get rid of "full" since nothing we
have uses it, and if you're resorting to full there's likely better ways to
search for what you want.
6) I wouldn't mind adding in some form of ":all" functionality for body/rawbody
which would basically do a join("",@array_of_paragraphs) && s/\s+/ /g before
doing the test. That way people who want to try it can, and if they blow their
own system up with bad RE -- well, that's not our problem. ;)
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
