http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-11 21:04 ------- What do we gain by being able to run tests according to priority, besides making sure AWL goes last? Is this preparation for "short-circuiting", so that we can stop processing if the score goes above/below a certain threshold? Also, while we're discussing changing the order rules are run, what about the decision-tree method for determing ham/spam, which requires running rules in an arbitrary order. Are we going to push that back to 3.1.0, or 4.0.0? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
