> One issue: I've duplicated rendering code this way, because I wasn't sure
if we
> want to simply *replace* the current body rendering to remove invis text,
or
> not. Do we?
>
> If so, we can just nuke the duplication and fix {html_text} to not include
invis
> segments.
As a rule writer, I think vanishing invisible text during rendering will be
a good idea, it will simplify obfuscation tests, at least potentially.
Of course we still need rule access to the pre-rendered html to check for
bogus tags and whatnot, but I believe that is a separate consideration.
Loren
