http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3202
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-21 23:06 ------- Subject: Re: Replace DB_File with SQLite? On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 11:00:04PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I don't know if it has better I/O characteristics than DB_File, but it > > would let us do SQL all around, and use DBI/DBD, which is a goal we've > > had for a while. > > It's not a bad goal if it results in simpler and easier to maintain > code. However, we should compare its performance against QDBM and > perhaps TDB, though, not DB_File. Michael's performance experiments > with QDBM seemed pretty promising. Every single performance test I've done with SQLite I've stopped long before it finished because I didn't want to wait that long. My last test I stopped at about 5% done and it had already taken around 3 times longer than it was taking to do a complete run with DB_File. Michael ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
