http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2462
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-29 21:43 ------- > force small companies [ ... ] to buy a second mailserver I said they should _logically_ separate the servers. That can be done on one computer with two ip address aliases on the same network interface. Or use one ip address with an authentication method that uses a different port such as using SMTP/TLS or a VPN instead of STARTTLS or POP-before-SMTP. This isn't just a SpamAssassin issue. You use one ip address as your domain's public MX server, and a different ip address as the authenticating mail relay for your users/employees. That makes it trivially easy to separate handling of possible outide spam from mail that your users send. If you use one ip address for both, you have a difficult problem. If your setup is so small and low budget that you cannot have two static ip addresses and you have to use STARTTLS or POP-before-SMTP, you probably should be using your ISP's mail server as the MX server for your domain, even if you want to do the bulk of the mail processing on your own server. That indirection will also take care of this problem. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
