On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 03:11:49PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Sidney Markowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > When I suggested making the atime in Bayes two bytes instead of four by > > making it coarser grained than one second, somebody (Justin?) said that > > it had been tried and produced problems in handling expiry. > > If I recall correctly, it makes expiry difficult when entire Bayes DBs > are being cycled through faster than the granularity allows -- some > sites get a lot of email. Justin, Theo, and Kelsey might have some more > information about this, but there might also be some old threads/bugs -- > search for atime in bugzilla and/or on the mailing list.
I don't have any useful input here. Just that, in our case, without a global bayes DB, we shouldn't see anything different that any individual that gets alot of email. Our top users get upto a couple thousand a day, most are nowhere near this. -- Kelsey Cummings - [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonic.net, inc. System Administrator 2260 Apollo Way 707.522.1000 (Voice) Santa Rosa, CA 95407 707.547.2199 (Fax) http://www.sonic.net/ Fingerprint = D5F9 667F 5D32 7347 0B79 8DB7 2B42 86B6 4E2C 3896
