http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2419
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-06 01:43 -------
What the heck, I checked in the 9 rule variation I proposed.
I honestly wasn't even looking at the original bug report when I delved into
finding better ranges, but I think the end result provides what the reporters
were seeking in that we have a 1% range then a 4% range and then a 15% range
at the end points. Before we had 1% then 9% and 10%. The reduction of 9% to
4% buys quite a bit. 10% vs. 15% is pretty much a wash if you look at the
S/O ratios:
RANGE SPAM% HAM% S/O ratio
0.00-0.01 0.014 93.100 0.000150353
0.01-0.05 0.007 1.357 0.00513196
0.05-0.10 0.014 0.736 0.0186667 <- same S/O ratio
0.10-0.20 0.014 0.764 0.0179949 <- same S/O ratio
0.20-0.40 0.007 1.159 0.00600343
0.40-0.60 2.132 2.605 0.450074
0.60-0.80 1.423 0.109 0.928851
0.80-0.90 0.872 0.048 0.947826 <- same S/O ratio
0.90-0.95 0.722 0.034 0.955026 <- same S/O ratio
0.95-0.99 1.744 0.034 0.980877
0.99-1.00 93.053 0.055 0.999409
So, might as well just combine them and I did.
Closing as fixed.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
