http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3358
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Marking outlook mail with |Received header trust level
|MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT |not determined correctly
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-09 18:03 -------
> Surely RFC2476 is the relevent reference here, and that allows the Message-ID
> to
> be added by the MTA. In fact, it specifically allows the MTA to replace any
> Message-ID provided by the MUA with one it generates itself.
Yes, RFC 2476 is also relevant, but the test is attempting to look for mail
that has been relayed and yet still lacks a Message-ID (so the Message-ID has
neither been added by the MUA nor successive MTAs until reaching a trusted
relay). The problem is that our current code isn't correctly determining
the trust level for this message's Received header.
> Besides which, in a multi-user environment, the MUA and MTA are often running
> on
> the same machine, so you can't assume that the Message-ID was added by the MTA
> just because it contains the MTA's FQDN.
No, and we don't in 3.0-svn. I realize your bug is against 2.6x, but that code
isn't going to get fixed, I'm just trying to fix the equivalent test (which also
triggers for this message) in 3.0-svn.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
