-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> I can understand your hesitation based on that Yahoo comment. However, I > would think that any > > plans to code some more useful information into the Message-ID at > > some, indeterminate, time in the future > would include some punctuation or digits or lower case letters. This > rule tests only for one unbroken string of upper case letters, which > does not exist now in any valid Message-Id from yahoo, and I doubt > strongly it would exist in any future valid Message-Id. I agree -- that's a reasonable assumption IMO. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAqEAWQTcbUG5Y7woRAltRAJ0a4YIj0HQJCwVhtxjsKCrEOM1bTgCfRHZo cJ5UtybP0X/l3rbu+8DgYTg= =u5cb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
