On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 12:28:53AM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote: > I think 2000 is too old for ham, although I think Theo uses some really > old mail in his corpus. For ham, a year is okay, maybe two years at the
FYI, I have really old ham (back to '95 I believe), but my nightly runs
are either the last 2 weeks (nightly) or 1 week (saturday's weekly net)
of mail.
For the full mass-check runs, I'll probably do X months of ham and 2
weeks of spam. I think we do X=3 or X=6 typically. I forget off-hand.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I didn't have Scotch Tape for many years, but I sure as hell use it now."
- Larry Young, 2002/06/16, discussion about not having email
pgpDB9pdLBooT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
