Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just to check: "needed prior review" takes into account the fact there > was a ticket and 4 +1s (if you assume I gave a +1 to my own patch)?
I didn't actually look at the ticket, I was just hoping to allow this sort of really simple, non-controversial, and nearly impossible to screw up fix *without* the review. :-) As a counter-example, changing a for loop to a while loop would be considered easy to screw up and would definitely need review. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
