http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3438
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-03 21:11 ------- Subject: Re: Conflicting API documentation -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> side comment: I'd be a happier camper if the external API did not have >> the isspam flag and instead had a class flag which would initially accept >> "ham" or "spam". on/off is the wrong semantics for the long-run. > >It's probably too late to change now, isn't it? it is. this API has been that way since 2.50. however, Dan's right for the long run, so new APIs should do something like that... - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAv/ZHQTcbUG5Y7woRArqrAKDMzsHlAAuZH7sJmHUWjRG8hO+VUQCfd+vZ d1L8k9LL83GyCRBsvTNQxpE= =Izrv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
